Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:45 pm Post subject:
Hardwiring LED's to outputs.
I soldered in 8 patchable LED's tonight with in's and out's. Ok, that works, BUT...(some observations the Lunetta user may recognize):
The slower oscillators have a "Master Clock" feel to them, and the faster ones do pitch like stuff. I tend to use some outputs more often than others.
So LED's could be hardwired to (selected) outputs for faster patching. But as the direction of the LED makes a difference as well I could use two LED's per output. Hrmm, that gets complicated again... maybe I'll just do that on 2 or 3 slower divisions from the 4040's.
I'd love to. Unfortunately I can't afford the energy. My assistant has been ill since November, I'm doing precision manual work during the day, developing an increasing tremor, my laptop is having issues, my Reaktor won't record, my Kore controller needs repair, has been lying idle for months now (I loved that thing for all the freaky Vst's it ran), so I'm slow and I'm tired. It took me all yesterday evening to shakingly solder 8 LED's with their inputs. Being enviously amazed by your 11 IC second Lunetta board. That said, I'm doing fine otherwise.
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:44 pm Post subject:
Simplest dirtiest synth to PC recording
Hey there electri-fire, thanks for your stacks of helpful schems. Last night I found the quickest, dirtiest possible way to record sound from my circuits. Attach a couple of feet of cable between a stereo jack and a piezo disk. Plug the jack into your PC's mic input, and lay the cable across your lap. Touch the output wire of your circuit with a finger and it will induce a surprisingly loud and clear signal in the wire. I recorded the arpeggiator I was working on to demonstrate the quality.
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:31 pm Post subject:
Re: Simplest dirtiest synth to PC recording
rich decibels wrote:
(Seriously this works great!)
Indeed it does sound fine! I guess you had the piezo attached already when you discovered this? I think it may even work without it, or with a small capacitor instead, as you're not really using the piezo as an acoustic pickup.
Heheh, remote pickup of CMOS signals usually is a problem rather than an asset. Thanks for pointing out this practical use. Hey, no mixer needed as well, you can finger in the sounds from your points of interest!
And hey, welcome to the forum rich decibels ( nice nick btw)
I thougt I was gating with the LED's, put on my "I want to know" hat, and was trying to figure out some truth tables.
These conditions without a LED:
A B
0 0
0 1 *
1 0
1 1
Expected Gate effect with LED
A B
0 0
0 0 *
1 0
1 1
* change
But then, it doesn't sound the way I expected from my theory. Several actions are happening at one.
Pulse Width.
Charge and discharge of the timing capacitor determin wether you get a Hi or a Low. In 40106 PWM schematics diodes are used to influence Pulse With. Suppose
oscillator A is Lo, oscillator B is Hi , current can flow through the LED or diode, so now oscillator B has to charge capacitor A as well.
Imagine more LED's for example from A to other outputs, some reversed polarity, things are getting complicated.
Next, more complicated still: Bleed through
The output B is connected to output A but with reduced voltage, depending on the LED's "diode drop" voltage.
quote:
" It is safe enough to assume 1.7 volts of voltage drop for non-high-brightness red, 1.9 volts for high-brightness, high-efficiency and low-current red, and 2 volts for
orange and yellow, and 2.1 volts for green. Assume 3.4 volts for bright white, bright non-yellowish green, and most blue types. Assume 4.6 volts for 430 nM bright
My LED's are in a row, so adjacent LED's might pick up each other. I still have to check that. If this prooves relevant, putting the LED's in a cluster makes optimum
use of the feature. Or putting a shrink tube or something on them reduces it?
The slew rate represents the maximum rate of change of a signal at any point in a circuit. Diodes reduce Slew Rate.
I can affirm this is happening indeed, as I recognise the LED sound. Cheap old fashioned Red LED's sound best. Green and Yellow are ok. High-brightness LED's
have less of that fat warm growl.
Some future edits expected
2-osc-with-LED.jpg
Description:
Filesize:
37.04 KB
Viewed:
549 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.
Joined: Oct 17, 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Columbus Ohio
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:19 pm Post subject:
Thanks electri-fire and droffset for the LED "gating" idea. It is providing no end to my lunetta entertainment on the breadboard. Nothing so far has burned up while I was putting LEDs between any random CMOS pins. So far.
Now, the big question, which electri-fire was delving into: What exactly are the LEDs doing? I guess they are mixing and gating and shorting? Can an electronics expert offer a more official explanation that might help us take the next step up towards more intentional, more complex use of LEDs?
The sound makes me think that I've tapped into an alien world.
By the way, I am running my 4000-series CMOS chips on a 9V battery but I see 5V recommended in the documentation. Is 5V better?
Thanks also to dgtom for the 4066-switched-capacitor idea which looks like fertile ground for more experimenting, too.
Maybe we can make a synth from just LEDs and capacitors? Plus a 40106 oscillator.
Done. Not the best quality, but to give you an idea. I meant to post in the Lunetta Sound Samples thread, but it ended up as a seperate subject by accident. Ah well...
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum